The following is
not my intellectual property, for possessing any amount of such requires a
measure of intelligence. This rant is simply my overzealous extrapolations of
this past Sunday’s lesson from preacher and servant, Mark Smith:
Tamar was a
respectable woman. She was a beloved daughter of King David, and was valued not
only for her nobility but also for her chaste temperament. For Tamar’s purity
and innocence, she was adorned with garments that the text describes as
“ornate” or “many colored.” I’m certain that many are familiar with the destiny
of a more prominent Biblical character that possessed a “coat of many colors,”
and so we need not strain our minds to assume hardships were to ensue.
Tamar had a
brother (technically a half-brother) named Amnon whose feelings for his sister
lied outside the realm of acceptability, and he recognized that no proper union
could result from his feelings, and so he plotted. I’ll spare you the details
of the plot and the deviousness through which the schemes were carried out, but
because of one man’s lust, Tamar’s chastity was tainted.
I’ve now arrived
to the crux of the passage and where my tirade may begin. Many ancient (and
some modern) societies practiced active polygamy, and though I am not calling
David’s character into question, he did have a son who actively participated.
These polygamist societies spoil and pervert women’s worth and destroy any
credibility for men. The naïve banter of some of my contemporaries may claim
that we in America have resolved the strange belief, but I would say only in the
strictest of senses. I say that the same principles are alive and well on
college campuses throughout the country. Brother Mark Smith aptly stated that
college campuses are societies of “soft polygamy.” In this quasi-polygamist
society, there exist two congregations, those I’d like to call the more mature
who date to find a mate for life, and the “hook-up” culture activists. The “hook-up” culture does not offer several partners
like polygamy stipulates, but in a sense doesn’t it? Certain demographics
(whose names and organizations I shall not include) are well known for these
tendencies, and these so-called adults demean not only themselves but those with
whom they interact. Not only does this society stigmatize college campuses, but
what hurts me most is that it also stigmatizes love in itself. The
transgressive behaviors ruin love for the culture’s beneficiaries and even for
those participating in the former category. Kids reduce love from this deep and
(in the literal sense) awesome connection, to a shallow, physical perversion of
God’s intentions. What’s even more damaging is that it is an appealing society,
so those looking for true love will be left wanting. One true love is becoming
an endangered species.
From my jumbled,
scattered, and yet pointed remarks, you may be able to surmise in which tribe I
claim citizenship, but despite my allegiances, I would like to apologize to all
of those who’ve been hurt by this society, and to all those who have
discredited love, I say keep your heads up. Lastly, for everyone else whom this
article has no affect on, I ask to remember two things: 1) The tomb is empty 2)
God is faithful.
No comments:
Post a Comment